Empirical study shows that contemporary setencing practice of suspended death penalty with limited reduce is neither addition process based on death penalty nor subtraction process based on suspended death penalty.Whether making a limited reduce to the defendant or not depends on both preventitiveand retributive circumstances.The implication of TSSAS can be used for examing the real affacting of multiple circumstances in cases.The setencing practice of suspended death penalty with limited reduce by Homicide in China maintains basic balance between crime and penalty.The suspended death penalty with limited reduce indeed makes it harder than suspended death penalty，meanwhile it also makes it lighter than death penalty.The guidance effact of criminal guidance case number 4 and number 12 should be supplemented by more cases.The article also analysises key circumstances and large sample cases，moreover，it suggests setencing rules of suspended death penalty with limited reduce by three types of homicide.