法学家
  
   首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿指南  |  广告服务  |  联系我们
法学家  2019, Issue (1): 124-134    DOI:
最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
快递服务合同典型化的立法表达与实现路径
郑佳宁,法学博士,中国政法大学民商经济法学院教授。
The Typification of the Express Delivery Service Contract:from the Perspective of Legislative Expression and Implementation Method
Zheng Jianing, Ph.D. in Law, Professor of Civil, Commercial and Economic Law School of China University of Political Science and Law.
 全文: PDF (9638 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 快递服务合同对我国快递服务的发展起到重要支撑作用。随着我国快递服务的不断拓展和法律规范的不断完善,快递服务合同已经实现了高度的社会普遍性,具备了典型化立法的客观基础,将其规定为有名合同有重要的现实意义。快递服务合同难以为其他合同所包含,在规范视角上具有典型化的可行性。快递服务合同典型化立法应当从厘清合同相关主体、构建合同义务群和明确合同救济措施三个方面,着力构建快递服务基本规范体系,并在民法典编纂过程中纳入合同编中予以具体规定。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
郑佳宁
关键词民法典   合同分则   快递服务合同   《电子商务法》     
Abstract: The express delivery service contract vitally sustains the development of express delivery service in China.With the expansion of China's express delivery service in scale and the constant perfection of relevant legal norms, the express delivery service contract has yet been equipped with the feature of social universality, thus has possessed the objective basis to be standardized by legislation.Therefore, the typification legislation of express delivery service is of practical significance.Additionally, the express delivery service contract can hardly be involved into other types of contracts, for which it bears feasibility in typification in the normative view.The typification legislative process of express delivery service contract should focus on three aspects, namely clarifying relative parties in the contract, constructing the group of contractual obligations as well as setting up remedial measures after the breach of contracts, so as to construct the fundamental normative system of express delivery service, then to incorporate the express delivery contract into the Contract Law division in process of codifying civil laws.Thus, the typification of the express delivery service contract can be truly achieved.
Key wordsCivil Code   Specific Provisions of Contract Law   Express Delivery Service Contract   E-Commerce Law of the People's Republic of China   
引用本文:   
郑佳宁. 快递服务合同典型化的立法表达与实现路径[J]. 法学家, 2019, (1): 124-134.
ZHENG Jia-Ning. The Typification of the Express Delivery Service Contract:from the Perspective of Legislative Expression and Implementation Method[J]. , 2019,(1): 124-134.
 
相关文章:   
[1] 王利明. 民法典编纂与中国民法学体系的发展[J]. 法学家, 2019, 0(3): 70-82.
[2] 李贝. 民法典继承编引入“特留份”制度的合理性追问
        ——兼论现有“必留份”制度之完善
[J]. 法学家, 2019, 0(3): 83-95.
[3] 许中缘. 政治性、民族性、体系性与中国民法典[J]. 法学家, 2018, 171(6): 32-48.
[4] 王利明. 准合同与债法总则的设立[J]. 法学家, 2018, 166(1): 117-127.
[5] 郑尚元. 民法典制定中民事雇佣合同与劳动合同之功能与定位[J]. 法学家, 2016, 1(6): 57-69.
[6] 王利明. 关于制定民法总则的几点思考[J]. 法学家, 2016, 1(5): 1-9.
[7] 王利明. 人格权的积极确权模式探讨
——兼论人格权法与侵权法之关系
[J]. 法学家, 2016, 1(2): 1-14.
[8] 姜福晓. 人格权财产化和财产权人格化理论困境的剖析与破解[J]. 法学家, 2016, 1(2): 15-26.
[9] 石佳友. 民法典与法官裁量权[J]. 法学家, 2007, 1(6): 58-65.
[10] 龚廷泰, 眭鸿明. “习惯法权”与中国民法典之编纂[J]. 法学家, 2007, 1(1): 116-121.
[11] 焦富民, 盛敏. 论荷兰民法典的开放性、融和性与现代性——兼及对中国制定民法典的启示[J]. 法学家, 2005, 1(5): 142-148.

版权所有 © 2011《法学家》编辑部 
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn