法学家
  
   首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿指南  |  广告服务  |  联系我们
法学家  2018, Issue (6): 16-31    DOI:
最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
过渡型刑法学的主要贡献与发展前景
周光权,法学博士,清华大学法学院教授。
The Main Contribution and Development Prospect of Transitional Criminal Jurisprudence
Zhou Guangquan,Ph.D. in Law,Professor of Tsinghua University Law School.
 全文: PDF (14292 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 以苏联刑法学为反思对象、发展于社会转型期的我国当下刑法学具有鲜明的过渡特征。过渡型刑法学以发展教义学为目标,在体系性思考方面取得了长足进步,学派论争的局面初步形成。过渡型刑法学的主要贡献是提出阶层式犯罪论的多种变通理论;推进刑法上的实质思考;广泛运用规范性思考,接纳客观归责论的方法论。推动过渡型刑法学形成的关键因素包括比较研究方法的运用、学者的学派意识、关注中国现实等。提出过渡型刑法学概念,一方面,是要强调理论研究绝不能再回到以犯罪构成四要件说为核心的苏联刑法学的老路上;另一方面,也想揭示过渡型刑法学的自身局限性,促使当代刑法学者始终保持谦虚,不能认为自己掌握了唯一正确的真理。相反,应当在很长时期内接受不同学术观点并存的局面。过渡型刑法学的“再出发”不能拒斥法哲学、法社会学、社科法学的问题意识和思考方法;坚持刑事一体化的理念,促进学科之间的融通;放眼世界,真正把比较研究做好;在刑法学已经具备较好学术基础后,学者应该保持更为从容、缓和、成熟的心态,要注意防止学术观点的绝对化,防止简单化和图表式的对立,避免感情用事、凭直觉“选边站队”。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
周光权
关键词过渡型刑法学   体系性思考   规范性思考   教义学   比较研究     
Abstract: The current criminal jurisprudence of China,which originates from the Soviet criminal jurisprudence and develops itself in the social transition period,has the distinct transition characteristic.Aiming at the development of dogmatics,the transitional criminal jurisprudence has achieved great progress in systematic thinking.Based on this,the situation of debate between legal schools has been taking shape preliminarily.The main contribution of transitional criminal jurisprudence is to put forward a variety of alternative theories about hierarchical crime theory,to propel the substantive thinking,to adopt the normative thinking widely,and to accept the methodology of objective imputation theory.The key factors that promote the formation of transitional criminal jurisprudence include the application of comparative research method,the school-consciousness of scholars,the concern of social reality,and so on.To put forward the concept of transitional criminal jurisprudence,on one hand,it is necessary to emphasize that theoretical research should never return to the old road of Soviet criminal jurisprudence,which regards the theory of four elements as the core.On the other hand,the limitation of transitional criminal jurisprudence itself should be brought out so that to urge scholars to remain modest and give up the illusion that they have controlled the truth.This also means that different academic views should be coexisted for a very long time.The“restarting”of transitional criminal jurisprudence cannot reject the problem consciousness and thinking method of legal philosophy,legal sociology and social science of law.The idea of“criminal integration”should be upheld to facilitate the integration of disciplines.We should look around the world to do a good job of comparative research.After the criminal jurisprudence has acquired a good academic foundation,scholars should maintain a more calm,relaxed and mature state of mind,being careful to prevent the absolutization of academic views,to prevent the simplistic and diagrammatic opposition,to avoid impulsion and“choose sides”by intuition.
Key wordsTransitional Criminal Jurisprudence   Systematic Thinking   Normative Thinking   Dogmatics   Comparative Research   
引用本文:   
周光权. 过渡型刑法学的主要贡献与发展前景[J]. 法学家, 2018, (6): 16-31.
ZHOU Guang-Quan. The Main Contribution and Development Prospect of Transitional Criminal Jurisprudence[J]. , 2018,(6): 16-31.
 
相关文章:   
[1] 杨绪峰. 假想防卫的体系性反思[J]. 法学家, 2019, 0(1): 149-163.
[2] 陈辉. 后果主义在司法裁判中的价值和定位[J]. 法学家, 2018, 169(4): 35-50.
[3] 申卫星. 论遗体在民法教义学体系中的地位
        ——兼谈民法总则相关条文的立法建议
[J]. 法学家, 2016, 1(6): 162-174.
[4] 刘涛. 法教义学危机?
        ——系统理论的解读
[J]. 法学家, 2016, 1(5): 160-174.
[5] 赵宏. 法律关系取代行政行为的可能与困局[J]. 法学家, 2015, 1(3): 32-54.
[6] 李忠夏. 基本权利的社会功能[J]. 法学家, 2014, 1(5): 15-33.
[7] 蒋大兴. 商法:如何面对实践?——走向/改造“商法教义学”的立场[J]. 法学家, 2010, 1(4): 155-165.
[8] [美]Judith A .McMorrow. 美国法学教育和法律职业养成[J]. 法学家, 2009, 1(6): 20-30.
[9] 高铭暄, 王俊平. 《罗马规约》与中国刑法犯罪故意之比较[J]. 法学家, 2005, 1(4): 62-66.

版权所有 © 2011《法学家》编辑部 
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn