法学家
  
   首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿指南  |  广告服务  |  联系我们
法学家  2018, Issue (3): 1-14    DOI:
最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索  |  Next Articles  
法官员额制改革的理论反思
陈瑞华,法学博士,北京大学法学院教授,教育部长江学者特聘教授。
Theoretical Reflection on the System Reform of the Specified Number of Judge
Chen Ruihua, Ph.D. in Law, Professor of Peking University Law School.
 全文: PDF (12179 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 法官员额制改革的推行,在初步实现入额法官的专业化和精英化的同时,也带来了包括“案多人少”“诉讼效率下降”“办案法官不堪重负”等一系列问题。要解决这些问题,就需要以改革的思维,提出创造性的解决方案,同时可以吸取一些地方的成功改革经验,使之上升为可推广的制度安排。改革者应认真反思司法行政管理体制的变革,讨论入额法官审判团队的科学构建,思考合议制适用范围的合理限制,并将案件的集中审理以及法官职业保障的完善等问题,纳入进一步改革的课题之中。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈瑞华
关键词员额制   入额   行政事务   审判团队   集中审理     
Abstract: With the implementation of the System Reform of the Specified Number of Judge, the professionalization and elitism of the judges have been initially realized. But at the same time, a series of problems have also been brought in, such as the dilemma between more cases and fewer judges, the lower efficiency of litigation and the unbearable work burden of judges.In order to solve these problems, we need to put forward creative solutions with the mentality of reform, and we also can learn from the successful reform experience of some local reforms and make it an institutional arrangement for promotion.In the process of the further reform, the reformers should consider the basis of the system of the specified number seriously, review the system reform of the judicial administrative management, discuss the scientific construction of the judge's team, take the limitation of the application's scope of the collegiate system into account, and focus on the centralized trial of cases and the improvement of the professional security of judges.
Key wordsSystem of the Specified Number of Judge   Appointed Judge   Judicial Administrative Affairs   Trial Team   Centralized Trial   
引用本文:   
陈瑞华. 法官员额制改革的理论反思[J]. 法学家, 2018, (3): 1-14.
CHEN Rui-Hua. Theoretical Reflection on the System Reform of the Specified Number of Judge[J]. , 2018, 168(3): 1-14.
 
相关文章:   
没有找到本文相关文献

版权所有 © 2011《法学家》编辑部 
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn