法学家
  
   首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿指南  |  广告服务  |  联系我们
法学家  2018, Issue (1): 179-191    DOI:
最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |   
《合同法》第42条(缔约过失责任)评注
孙维飞,法学博士,华东政法大学法律学院副教授。
Comments on Article 42(Culpa in Contrahendo) of Contract Law
Sun Weifei, Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor of Law School of East China University of Political Science and Law.
 全文: PDF (11930 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 我国法上缔约过失责任独立于侵权责任是否有意义,取决于债务履行辅助人制度之有无。缔约过失责任不应适用于预约情形,但可适用于待批准的合同以及有效合同情形。缔约过失责任的核心特征在于义务违反发生于缔约过程中。缔约过失责任的赔偿范围在实践中似乎不包括固有利益损失,履行利益损失不可一概排除于赔偿范围之外。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙维飞
关键词缔约过失责任   预约   待批准的合同   缔约过程中的义务违反     
Abstract: The recognition of obligor's responsibility for assistant's wrong in Chinese civil law is the key for independence of Liability for Culpa in Contrahendo from tort liability. Article 42 of Contract Law is applicable to contract subject to approval and valid contract, but not to precontract. The core characteristic of liability for Culpa in Contrahendo is that breach of duty takes place in Contrahendo. In practice inherent interest is not, expectant interest is sometimes, protected through article 42 of Contract Law.
Key wordsCulpa in Contrahendo   Precontract   Contract Subject to Approval   Breach of Duty in Contrahendo   
引用本文:   
孙维飞. 《合同法》第42条(缔约过失责任)评注[J]. 法学家, 2018, (1): 179-191.
SUN Wei-Fei. Comments on Article 42(Culpa in Contrahendo) of Contract Law[J]. , 2018, 166(1): 179-191.
 
相关文章:   
[1] 陆青. 《买卖合同司法解释》第2条评析[J]. 法学家, 2013, 1(3): 113-127.

版权所有 © 2011《法学家》编辑部 
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn