法学家
  
   首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿指南  |  广告服务  |  联系我们
法学家  2016, Issue (3): 99-112    DOI:
最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
竞技体育伤害行为的正当化根据及边界
钱叶六,苏州大学王健法学院教授、南京师范大学中国法治现代化研究院特邀研究员。
Proper Foundationand Boundary of Competitive Sports Act
Qian Yeliu,Professor of Kenneth Wang Law School of Soochow University,Invited Researcher of Institute for Chinese Legal Modernization Studies(ICLMS)in Nanjing Normal University.
 全文: PDF (10232 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 规则范围内的竞技体育伤害行为欠缺不法性或者说具有正当性。至于其正当化根据,应综合运用正当业务理论、危险接受理论(准同意说)和优越利益原理进行多维的阐释和说明。对于违反竞技体育规则造成严重伤害的行为,以往多是基于“司法不介入”的理念,交由体育行业内部自治。但行业自治不能排斥法律的适用,当违规竞技体育行为造成严重的法益侵害后果时,刑法便有介入的必要。基于人身犯罪之规范保护目的,对于违反比赛规则致人重伤、死亡的以及恶意利用比赛规则伤害他人的,应依据行为人的主观责任情状,追究其刑责。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
钱叶六
关键词竞技体育   基于合意的他者危险化   正当业务   危险接受理论   优越利益原理     
Abstract: Injured actions of competitive sports, if conducted within rules, is lack of illegality or could be justified.Its proper foundation is the theory of justifiable business, acceptance of risk(quasiconsensus of the victim)and superior interests.As to the serious injury caused by violating the rules of competitive sports, it is usually handled according to the internal autonomy of sports industry, based on the idea of“noninvolvement of judiciary”. However, internal autonomy should not reject the application of the law.When the lawbreaking behaviors cause serious infringement to the legal interests, it is necessary to apply The Criminal Law.According to the protective goal of the related regulations, when certain act violating the competition rules or using the rules for revenge or from spite to cause serious injury or death, the perpetrator shall take criminal responsibility in line with his subjectivity.
Key wordsCompetitive Sports   Risky Behavior Based on Consensus   Legitimate Profession   Theory of Acceptance of Risk   Theory of Superior Interests   
引用本文:   
钱叶六. 竞技体育伤害行为的正当化根据及边界[J]. 法学家, 2016, (3): 99-112.
QIAN Ye-Liu. Proper Foundationand Boundary of Competitive Sports Act[J]. , 2016, 1(3): 99-112.
 
相关文章:   
没有找到本文相关文献

版权所有 © 2011《法学家》编辑部 
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn