法学家
  
   首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿指南  |  广告服务  |  联系我们
法学家  2016, Issue (2): 60-75    DOI:
最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
犯罪竞合中的法益同一性判断
王彦强,法学博士,南京师范大学法学院副教授、中国法治现代化研究院研究人员。
The Judgment on the Legal Interest's Consistency in Competitions of Crime
Wang Yanqiang, Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor of Nanjing Normal University Law School.
 全文: PDF (12302 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 我国刑法中“特别法惟轻”的法条竞合现象,的确有部分是因为错将想象竞合当作法条竞合造成的。区分法条竞合与想象竞合的实质标准是法益同一性。属于同类法益的具体法益之间未必具有同一性,而不属于同类法益的具体法益之间也未必不具有同一性。当判断竞合关系涉及侵害复合法益的犯罪时,不能忽视必要保护之次要法益,次要法益与它罪法益亦可能具有法益同一性;不能混淆次要法益与附随法益,误将附随法益当作次要法益,将导致法条竞合现象的不当扩张。法益是否同一除考虑法益性质和内容外,也受制于法益保护范围和程度,即保护相同法益,但保护程度或范围存在轻重大小之别的条文之间,亦可认为法益不同一,而成立想象竞合。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王彦强
关键词法条竞合   想象竞合   法益同一   同类法益   次要法益   附随法益     
Abstract: In our criminal law the punishment of the special article is lighter than the common article, probably because we mistake“imaginative joinder of offenses”as“overlapping of legal provisions”.The substantive distinction between these two terms lies in the consistency of legal interests.Two specific legal interests under same legal interest category may not share something in common, and two specific legal interests category may  be identical.In judging the competing relationship about the crimes which damages complex legal interests, we cannot ignore to protect the secondary legal interests, which and the legal interests of other crimes may also be identical.We cannot confuse the secondary legal interests with stochastic legal interests.Mistaking stochastic law interests as secondary legal interests will lead to the improper expansion of“overlapping of legal provisions”.To judge the consistency of legal interests, we should take into account both the legal interests' properties and contents and the scopes and extents, if there are differences in the scopes and extents.Possibilities are that“imaginative joinder of offenses”are constituted.
Key wordsOverlapping of Legal Provisions   Imaginative Joinder of Offenses   The Consistency of Legal Interests   Kindred law Interest   Secondary Legal Interest   Stochastic Legal interest   
引用本文:   
王彦强. 犯罪竞合中的法益同一性判断[J]. 法学家, 2016, (2): 60-75.
WANG Yan-Qiang. The Judgment on the Legal Interest's Consistency in Competitions of Crime[J]. , 2016,(2): 60-75.
 
相关文章:   
[1] 蔡道通. 特别法条优于普通法条适用
——以金融诈骗罪行为类型的意义为分析视角
[J]. 法学家, 2015, 1(5): 29-42.
[2] 张明楷. 法条竞合中特别关系的确定与处理[J]. 法学家, 2011, 1(1): 29-46.

版权所有 © 2011《法学家》编辑部 
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn